Posts Tagged mean

Smile – Speak – Respect

According to the CDC I am no longer a senior citizen. I am an elder. Likewise I am no longer a father I am a parent. The CDC should know that I am proud of being Suzanne’s and Michael’s father. The CDC is correct in emphasizing how we talk to and about each other. A critical article about this report was reprinted from WashingtonExaminer.com by The Week Magazine in its September 10/September17, 2021 issue. The article by Tiana Lowe is wrong headed.

In his sermon at the French Huguenot Church in Charleston on September 5, 2021, The Rev. Phil Bryant emphasized the power of words. “Words can hurt. Words can heal. Words can challenge. Words can direct what we do. In all the ways we interact with one another, our words are the most powerful. Words can kill.”

In support of the last statement, Bryant quotes Chaplain David Sparks at Dover Air Force Base, who has comforted so many families over the past 20 years, because a family member has sacrificed her or his life after the 9/11 attack. “I am aware — this is very spiritual — I am aware that there are — there have been multiple times when I did not have the preparation for a particular moment when words came up out of me that were not my own. And I said them. And once in a while, it was — for the first time — I heard it the first time when it came around in my own ear. And where in the world did that come from? And those are very holy moments for me.”

Every report states that our culture has become meaner, Part of the blame for this regression is rooted in how we talk to and about each other. Because I disagree with you does not mean that I hate you or think that you are a lesser person. It simply means that you and I see an issue differently. I love my sister and she would walk through hot coals barefoot for me, but we have different ideas about politics, church music and biscuits.  We grew up together with the same parents, but we look at the world differently.

I do not know why we have grown meaner as a culture; however, I do know how to lessen the impact of the meanness. Smile at the people you meet. Say something nice to each person. Treat each person you meet with respect. That’s it. Try it for yourself.

  1. Smile at each person you meet.
  2. Say something nice to each person you meet.
  3. Show respect for each person you meet.

Tags: , , ,

How Simple Acts Can Counter Meanness

by Mitch Carnell | Aug 30, 2021 | Feature-, Opinion -www.goodfaithmedia.org

“Hurry up,” an agitated man in the cafeteria checkout line kept mumbling.
My friend Bob, a very gentle soul, turned to him and said, “Take it easy. You’ll live longer.”
I thought they were friends and that this was friendly banter. Instead, the man followed him into the parking lot and wanted to fight.
“Why have we become so mean?” I wondered.
This topic is discussed frequently in the mainstream media and on social media. Numerous reasons are put forward.
Take your pick on the causes: the pandemic, wearing a mask, isolation, loss of paychecks, loss of identity, loss of control, conspiracy theories, the list could go on.
I readily admit that I do not know precisely what is contributing to this mean behavior; however, I do know how to lessen the severity of the problem and return us to our more genial demeanor.
The solution is simple, and everyone can participate.
Smile at people and speak to them in a friendly manner. If you are not ready to practice both, then just smile at those you meet.
My late wife suffered from Alzheimer’s disease. She no longer could speak, but her smile was enough to carry me through the darkest day.
Yes, I missed her cheerful words, but her smile lit my world. It drove the dark clouds away and put me in a much better place.
Try it. You have nothing to lose. A smile has wonderful powers. It can drive the blues away and sweeten the sourest disposition.
When you are ready, take the next step. Add a simple greeting. “Hello. I’m glad to see you,” or “How have you been?” or, “Hi, my name is…”
When I was the CEO of a non-profit agency, the president of the board of directors endeared himself to everyone. He never made you fumble for his name. “Hello, I’m John Smith,” he greeted you with an outstretched hand and a smile.
In many Christian churches, the service includes passing the peace. Other congregations practice extending the right hand of fellowship.
Both practices are rooted in Scripture. Both convey a message of peace and welcome. A handshake carries the same message.
The Say Something Nice Day (June 1) and Say Something Nice Sunday (the first Sunday in June) movements share the same motives to break down barriers and create a friendlier environment.
I like to speak to everyone I encounter. My children, when they became teenagers, were embarrassed by my behavior. They chastised me, “Daddy, do you know that person? Then, why did you speak to them?”
My answer, “Why not? Why not acknowledge another human being?”
Every person we meet is struggling with something. We do not know the anguish of the people we pass.
Some are suffering from deep wounds or are enduring hurts from long ago. Some have just lost a job or a spouse.
The simple action of a smile or greeting can change their day. As my mother often said, “Son, be nice.”
It is within our power to change things one interaction at a time. We can behave in such a way that others want to be around us.
No sermon is required. Our behavior is sermon enough.
We may not always know the right words to say or be in the mood to speak to others. If this is the case, just smile.
There may be a few who will ignore or ridicule you but smile anyway.

Tags: , , ,

Wanting to Live in a Pelagian Universe, if at all possible now!

 

Linda McKinnish Bridges* October 26, 2016

I must confess.  I am weary, and I am tired.  Weary and tired from hearing bad words from bad people who do bad things and create bad worlds.  I need a little peace from the rancor, a little quietness from the chaos, a little respite from meanness.   You know what I mean.  I need to go sit on a long front porch on one of these beautiful autumnal, crisp mornings, surrounded by color, and just remember what a good world we live in, the absolute goodness of people who live in it, and experience rejuvenated hope that the world is not going to collapse in on itself from all of this hate and divisiveness.

I was raised in an Augustinian universe, as is most Christianity.  The idea that we are sinners by nature, even the little baby fresh from the womb, prevails.  That we all bear this tremendous stain of guilt and sin until we are washed in the blood and cleansed to be made holy is my default theological position.  Both tradition and scripture uphold this truth.  And certainly our favorite hymn, extolling our badness and the joys of grace, now regarded as a kind of national anthem played at funerals, weddings, and military battle, regardless of religious affiliation: “Amazing grace . . .  that saved a wretch like me.”  Wicked, wretched, sinful, bad, prone to evil rather than good—all these attributes given to human nature, some say, originated from Augustine (d. 430), who with great influence and power over Christian thinking, introduced the concepts of original sin and the need for redeeming grace in the fifth century.

Much of my youth was spent in trying to eradicate those sins—daily list of sins, overt and covert, early morning prayers in the top floor of the college dormitory to cleanse my thoughts for the day ahead, confessions of those sins in the evening in late night prayer group, in front of really holy leaders who demanded an accounting of every minute of the day.  (We forgot to ask the leaders to do the same!) The idea was clear—if one can list all of one’s sins, go to the one to whom you have abused and confess your sin, then ask God for forgiveness, only then you can be whole and righteous.  Lots of list making, lots of personal contact information, lots of prayer.  Then wholeness, maybe . . . . . .

It really was not until my middle life years, upon meeting Dr. John Kinney, Virginia Union Theological Seminary, Richmond, Virginia, that I really knew how to respond to my neat and dramatic, to say the least, Augustinian universe.  John Kinney, who has shaped the theological thought, especially for the African American community, and a not a few white people who could see the theological jewel therein, helped me to see that if you are broken, the least possible help for restoration is the Augustinian universe.  Kinney explained in both personal conversation and public lecture, to a group of already broken, busted, downhearted folk, to stand in the pulpit and declare their wretchedness is not going to change a thing—except to make more wretchedness.  I began to see it!   Kinney has a way of making it clear.  For those busted, broken, downhearted people need to hear that they do hold a God-light inside them that can make them whole—that their life, even though busted and broken, has the seed of wholeness.  And the goal is to grow that seed not kill it.  Kinney used to say it this way: “We begin with the credit column, not the debit one.”  I began to see another universe—slowly but surely.

Studying a contemporary of fifth-century Augustine in my research in Celtic Theology—Pelagius (d. 418)– gave me more words and much hope.  Thought perhaps to be from Ireland, and certainly a participant in the fifth-century Irish Christian movement raised without conformity to Roman standards until the 10th century, Pelagius introduced another way.  That way was, of course, denounced and condemned, as the concepts seemed light and airy compared to the heavy-weighted dicta of the Roman church and Augustinian pillars of thought. Pelagius believed in the power and quality of human nature—not deeming all flesh as ineffective and sinful.  That the human spirit had promise and could do the right thing.  In other words, human nature has a propensity for goodness not badness.  Why should that be a such a surprise, we are created in the image of God, right?  Pelagius believed in God’s grace, certainly.  But free will also reigned.  That is why John Wesley and Methodism even today can describe Pelagius as a “wise and holy man.”  The universe that Pelagius inhabits says that we can create goodness, that we begin as whole and then err, but that we can begin again. Our nature is bent toward the Light, rather than Darkness.

What a difference that would make if we could reclaim hope, compassion, goodness in this world.  If we could see the goodness in our neighbor—deep inside, resting, sometimes hidden by bluster, ego, wounds, but still there deeply within the soul, how would I treat the guy beside me on the plane, the young woman at the stop light in the car beside me, my estranged family member, my bully colleague?

We need help these days.  Bring back the noble character of those who refuse to call names, who refuse to talk when someone else is talking, who makes a point by acknowledging the point of the other, even though vehemently disagreeing, but politely, with civility.  Bring back “yes, sir,” “yes ma’am,” “you go first”, “I understand you”. Bring back a basic belief in the human nature of all of us.  We have all that we need to be all that God has intended us to be—with us, in us, around us, through us, behind us—all around us.  Hope in the goodness of our neighbors, compassion for the world, kindness and civility even in heated disagreements, and a general awareness that the Grace—that Amazing Grace– is available and has been there from the beginning—inside all of God’s created order.  Live into it, my friend.  It is time to find an alternative universe, don’t you think?

*Rev. Linda McKinnish Bridges and I first met in 1991 at the Chautauqua Institution in Western New York State. She was the chaplain of the week and it was my first time attending there. She made a lasting impression on me and I have followed her career since then.

Tags: , ,

Snark: It’s Ruining Our Conversation.

David Denby. Snark: It’s Mean; It’s Personal and It’s Ruining Our Conversation. New York. Simon and Schuster. ©2009.

            David Denby’s Snark is much like my undergraduate music appreciation course. I enrolled because I thought that it would be an easy enjoyable romp for a high grade. I was only half right. It was enjoyable. The same is true for Snark. People have been hunting the Snark since the publication of Lewis Carroll’s, “The Hunting of the Snark,” in 1876.  Thousands have found it and suffered its fangs but none have succeeded in killing it. Denby maintains that Snarks existed much earlier than most advocates realize and he is supported by the English Oxford Dictionary.

            Snark is much more than a casual read. There is much research presented to support the claims. Much of it enlightening and much of it is tedious. Snark is individualized. It is intended to inflict pain or to make the person snarked disappear. It is often camouflaged as humor; however, it has absolutely no redeeming characteristics. “Snark is not the same as hate speech, which is abuse directed at groups. Hate speech slashes and burns, and hopes to incite but without much attempt at humor.”  Denby further distinguishes it from teenagers on the internet who taunt the parents of children murdered or abused.

            “Snark will get you any way it can and to hell with consistency.” Denby does not advocate for the demise of humor or the very clever sarcastic comment delivered with style. Politicians are fair game. He is a fan of Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart.

            The real consequences of Snark are often felt by the very vulnerable – people who are so undone by the attacks that they can no longer function and disappear from view. That is the real purpose to make its targets vanish. The results may come to life years later when the college student caught on a cell phone camera in some sexual exploit or smoking pot is goggled by a potential employer or he/she decides to run for a political office but the images that are stored and available forever do him in before his job interview or campaign can get off the ground.

            We have the images fresh in our minds of those two eleven year old boys who committed suicide after being relentlessly bombarded by their peers with taunts of being gay. Denby might classify this as hate speech or just bullying but it carriers with it many of the same characteristics.

            Denby offers several principles of Snark. Attack without reason. Appeal to the most common hackneyed prejudice. Race becomes heaven here, but it must be disguised. Here is a beginning statement from a McCain ad “It should be known that in 2008 the world will be blessed. They will call him … The One.”  In the South, “The One” reference usually refers to someone who has gotten above himself, usually an uppity Black.

            The third principle is to reach into a grab bag of old jokes, film clips or insults and then give each choice a new twist.  These rely on old itches or wounds for their effect.  The fourth principle is apparent even to the most casual observer; throw some mud and assume that every rumor is true or at least usable. This easily combines with the next two principles: ignore the routine responsibilities of journalism and reduce all human complexity to caricature. Ann Coulter talking on CNN reduced torture to putting a caterpillar in the same cell with a non-combatant. “Movie producers who had a few early hits followed by a flop are suddenly discovered to be ‘pricks’, arrogant losers doomed to struggle and get nowhere.”

            The last two principles are common: attack the old because nobody cares. Attack expensive highly rated restaurants.

            Standup comedians are on display. They live or die by the reactions of the audience:; however, the snarker operates in stealth. He/she uses the internet or the airwaves without fear of censorship. Some of the worst offenses are attacks on women. Every inch of their bodies is held up for ridicule. Every unfortunate sexual exploit is spread anonymously across the internet. There is no recourse. There are no standards. Wade Burleson, a noted Oklahoma pastor writing in Christian Civility in an Uncivil World offers a set of guidelines, “Ten Commandments” for the internet.[1] These offer some help, but no doubt will be totally ignored by the snarkers. The celebration of Say Something Nice Day every year on the first day of June also tackles the impossible task with gusto.

            Denby squanders the last two short chapters discussing Maureen Dowd and Keith Olbermann neither of whom he is able to clothe with any merit.

            For those among us who like the well turned phrase, the funny sarcastic remark without the barb or the intent to wound, Snark is a fun, well done read. The examples are plentiful but quarnteed to offend partisans of any stripe. Unfortunately Snark is here to stay. It has successfully eluded every attempt to kill it. It is able to continue because there are no controls and most people, even “good people” either engage in it themselves and/or are too unconcerned to confront it. The last statement of the book offers the most hope. “Vituperation that is nasty, insulting, but, well, clean may live forever. Go and commit some. You’ll feel better. You’ll make other people feel better.”


[1] Mitch Carnell, Ed. Christian Civility in an Uncivil World. Macon. Smyth & Helwys. 2009.

Tags: , , , ,